Positivist is to focus on the intermingling of correlations between the do’s and don’ts of political clot. To see with keen eyes what it takes to build on what we have with what it takes to become the dominant species.
Post-Positivist is to realize with great regret that something is going on that has yet o be identified as purpose and cause to an outcome hat has been up until now has appear o be an impossibility that is unrealized to perceivers of justice and the correct course which is the nature of what remains and would change if things became somewhat different.
Realism is to assume all responsibility that a state region or country is in danger of foreseeable circumstances that demand immediate rectification and purpose to put at ease the citizen of such areas. It is with due course that abandonment is not a correct course of action and to do so would cause alarm and panic that could have been avoided.
Liberal Internationalism is the right to arbitration between parties at odds and to correlate the beneficial circumstances that led to dispute without such endangerment of lives and destruction of infrastructure. It is also the right to manifest new human rights in the name of people who are destined to become decision makers in world events that will lead to destined outcomes delivered by God as to how the world should turn by making it so the decision partakers of action to the outcomes have reasonable course to pursue with due diligence the activities that are so important to our creator.
Neorealism can be clarified by a stock market analyst 5-year growth factor prediction of companies’ successes by assembling the same theory and classification of growth o the government and is under takings. If a trusted advisor could find out the direct course of action that any area of government plans on taking in coming years wee could justify the direction of the country by its average growth rate in all industries hat the government chooses as its assemblage of digestible mannerisms of nature and the spoilage of humanity.
Neoliberalism is an effort by states of a nation to conduct on presumptive basis as short-term syndicates to portray an obedience to gains that can be had now or in near futures without regard to growth of the nation. It is further stated that if some effort on their part is enacted to produce relative future gain than an intergovernmental organization will form an institution to see where else in the nation and world these benefits gained short term will have long-term impact.
Regime Theory is the right to conduct affairs of influence to a smooth running ship without discourse on the behavior of the state and further the goal of longevity.
International society theory is an interfering anthropologist with their eye on change of what seems right in the eyes of those who do not know the course of action destined by those who are affected.
Social Constructivism is the very outcome that governs the course of events that leads to a successful arbitration between what is real and obtainable and what is apparent and needs invention to proceed.
Marxism is the pursuit of capital accumulation so in which if we could predict GDP and keep our debts to 15% we could accumulate capital with a steady growth rate.
Interest Group Perspective is a novel concept shared by a conglomerate of people who aspire to destine their lives to a pursuit of yearning for something that is yet to be offered. They could pursue this in the light of the world or in the back holes of garages for huge rewards and profits if the masses or even a select majority shared their ideals.
Strategic Perspective is trying to get someone to envision what the world would be like tomorrow if we did this this and this and by this time tomorrow. It is like trying to get a beaver out of his hole they liken it to being stalk and avoid any insight into something that no one could predict the outcome of tomorrow and don’t relies that impossible circumstances phrased within ten words or less for their feasibility are quite convincing to the public and most certain to encourage the ideal why didn’t any one think of this before since you said it so eloquently.
Poststructuralist theories is the ability to hold something of value for the use of another in order to maintain some form of power over another if it is truly a need of this other than they will give anything money or trade to get it.
Power is playing on another’s weakness with the resemblance of making them strong for the short term. If say you taught them how to fish you would hold no more power over them. Unless you taught how to provide for themselves but held the knowledge of how to conduct themselves after they had the resources.
Polarity the balance of power between the halves and the have nots’ is what is going on today we share a common focus of providing human rights between many nations and now that they do not have to travel to get their stuff from the U.S. anymore we are left to wonder will the right to happiness also be granted to them. It seems the U.S. makeup is the dominant form of government for the people of the world and making everyone a part of a growing society of nations has already begun. It is like having a cousin of this great country they may be different than you but they share the same genes. If we treat them like our family we will have respect and show love for one another.
Interdependence we get all our goods from the same sources and we choose to do the same things with our goods we are one with the same ideals but are far from interdependent if we can’t get someone from somewhere else to hire another person from somewhere else. Outsourcing from one U.S. to a cousin of the U.S. to the U.S. is the only way to establish this.
Dependency is when one state exploits another state for prosperity without dual recourse of prosperity. Dual recourse of prosperity would be to offer the barter system in exchange for goods that would lead to prosperity then both would benefit from the transaction. If money is exchange one may have more or less and the value of money to one is less than the value of money to the other therefore resources that are offered in exchange can be measure to the same quantifiable outcome as the merchandise being delivered.
Diplomacy is the negotiation tactic used so that not much is lost and the needs are met of both sides without limiting ourselves.
Sanctions are the due cause of showing your power of controlling a valuable good over another country.
War is a necessary evil.
Mobilization of international shame defaming a country for their lack of respect and outrage the other partnering country it is and may not be dealing with in the future.
Economic or diplomatic benefits are the use of common stature to play with the big dogs.
Unit level concepts
Regime Type a kind of unforgiveness for being different.
Revisionism/Status quo they like the benefits but hey dislike not having their own nature and identity when it comes to affairs that govern the world. We could settle to not dispute whether or not what works for them in their country might or might not work in other countries as well.
Religion is a way of identifying with here after and not he here now to live within life’s grip one must live as though their only purpose is to serve the needs of those they care about without interfering in the lives of the ones who upset them.
Science Technology in International Relations is defined to bring about new insight into the way the world operates and encourage invention in new ways.
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Thursday, July 3, 2008
The Never Ending Purchase
We have a problem when it comes to purchasing goods. It only works with new inflows of money. If we do not work for more money we do not buy at stores or bring goods into our households. I am going to show you a way to get people to purchase from your stores without them having to work their whole lives to do so.
All I expect is a contribution for this idea.
Picture a person applying for a store credit card and their eyes glaze over at the paper work that goes with it. But imagine an astute employee explaining to them a unique feature of this card. They will be able to get a rebate on all purchases which they could either take as is or have it deposited in an account with a fixed insurance annuity program so that their money can grow and 5% will go on their card yearly portioned out monthly so that their next purchase they could buy more.
Consider a monthly purchase of $100 at a 3% rabate one would get $3, $36 a year.
Consider option two the person would get $3 put in a fixed annuity to grow plus interest 5%
At an average 8% return on their money in a year their account would equal $37.34 and their next rebate for that month would be $.155 cents
Now consider 5 years of $100 monthly spending their account would equal $220.43 and their monthly rebate for month would be $.919
Now consider 50 years their account would be $23,980.81 and their interest would be $100
What if we did 5% rebate 8% return 5%interest payments
one year 62.24 interest monthly .259
5 years 367.38 interest monthly 1.531
43.84 years 23,980.81 interest $100
This show that eventually they will have the same amount of money that they were spending without ever having to take their own money out of their pocket to keep spending.
There are some fortunate things that could happen the money that goes back onto their card gets spent therefore increasing the amount of money invested and increases the amount of money avaiable to spend which the store gets.
If they spend more money each time and save more each time then the number of years to save the average spent would go down but it has to be invested in a safe account.
The ideal setting for anyone would be to offer your card to be able to get rebates from all shopping experiences or one network of stores which correlate to the needs of the consumer.
This shows that we could setup a store purchase plan with money management to get consumers to spend more money and also ideal to retire with to know that all their basic needs can be supplied through an account that will be with them throughout their lives.
Could you imagine if it was inheritiable, people would be able to spend enormous amounts of money monthly to keep the economy moving.
All I expect is a contribution for this idea.
Picture a person applying for a store credit card and their eyes glaze over at the paper work that goes with it. But imagine an astute employee explaining to them a unique feature of this card. They will be able to get a rebate on all purchases which they could either take as is or have it deposited in an account with a fixed insurance annuity program so that their money can grow and 5% will go on their card yearly portioned out monthly so that their next purchase they could buy more.
Consider a monthly purchase of $100 at a 3% rabate one would get $3, $36 a year.
Consider option two the person would get $3 put in a fixed annuity to grow plus interest 5%
At an average 8% return on their money in a year their account would equal $37.34 and their next rebate for that month would be $.155 cents
Now consider 5 years of $100 monthly spending their account would equal $220.43 and their monthly rebate for month would be $.919
Now consider 50 years their account would be $23,980.81 and their interest would be $100
What if we did 5% rebate 8% return 5%interest payments
one year 62.24 interest monthly .259
5 years 367.38 interest monthly 1.531
43.84 years 23,980.81 interest $100
This show that eventually they will have the same amount of money that they were spending without ever having to take their own money out of their pocket to keep spending.
There are some fortunate things that could happen the money that goes back onto their card gets spent therefore increasing the amount of money invested and increases the amount of money avaiable to spend which the store gets.
If they spend more money each time and save more each time then the number of years to save the average spent would go down but it has to be invested in a safe account.
The ideal setting for anyone would be to offer your card to be able to get rebates from all shopping experiences or one network of stores which correlate to the needs of the consumer.
This shows that we could setup a store purchase plan with money management to get consumers to spend more money and also ideal to retire with to know that all their basic needs can be supplied through an account that will be with them throughout their lives.
Could you imagine if it was inheritiable, people would be able to spend enormous amounts of money monthly to keep the economy moving.
Introduction

I've helped Apple come up with their concept for the IPOD.
I've helped American Express come up with their concept for the Savings Account Credit Card.
I've helped New York with their concept for the interconnected business cooperation.
I've helped AGIRI with their concept for the Avatar Artficial Intelligence Community.
I've helped various companies in space aviation with the concept of Space Simulation for Spaceship design.
I've helped with the concept of the picture in this introduction to develop one of the world's resource multipliers for far ahead future technology.
I've helped with the concept of putting multiple layers of solar film on one solar panel to multiply its energy production.
I've helped the DOE with the concept theory that atoms had intelligence guiding them to make their interactions.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
